Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.0 |
| 2019-04-18 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.83 x 2.73 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 960 x 480 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 203 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2460mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.4 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket has an overall score of 71.5, which is much better than Alcatel Avalon V's 58.9 score. Galaxy S III Cricket's design is lighter and just a bit thinner than the Alcatel Avalon V. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version while Alcatel Avalon V has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy S III Cricket has just a bit better performance than Alcatel Avalon V, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much better looking screen than Alcatel Avalon V, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater display pixels density and a lot better 1280 x 720 resolution.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Alcatel Avalon V, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 64 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity. Alcatel Avalon V has improved battery life than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 2460mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a way better camera than Alcatel Avalon V, because it has a much better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than the Alcatel Avalon V, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.