Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2016-11-10 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.05 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than the Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, getting a global score of 90.7 against 72.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 is a lot newer than the Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 has just a bit better looking display than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a just a little higher pixel amount per screen inch, a larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a little better processing power than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a really longer battery duration than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots better pictures and videos than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.