Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| 2016-07-15 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.06 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 8.69 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a global score of 71.5, which is just a bit better than the Alcatel Idol 4s's global score of 67.9. Galaxy S III Cricket's body is thicker but somewhat lighter than the Alcatel Idol 4s. The Alcatel Idol 4s has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Alcatel Idol 4s has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little bit larger screen and a lot better display pixel density. Alcatel Idol 4s counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Alcatel Idol 4s also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Alcatel Idol 4s counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a way better 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition. Alcatel Idol 4s features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.