Compare phones
Samsung Reclaim
SPH-M560| Global Score | |
| 33.8 | 36.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| -- | 2009-08-06 |
| 4.09 x 2.07 x 0.68 inches | 3.90 x 2.37 x 0.59 inches |
| 3.75 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| $ 150.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 2.6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 167 pixels per inch | 154 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 4.73 | 4.73 |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 850mAh Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 566 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 6 hours talk time |
| 2.32 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 2.0 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung Reclaim has a global score of 36.8, which is a bit better than Alcatel OneTouch 768T's score of 33.8. The Samsung Reclaim is a a little lighter and thinner cellphone than Alcatel OneTouch 768T. The Alcatel OneTouch 768T features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Reclaim, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240, the Alcatel OneTouch 768T also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Reclaim has a processor that is just as good as the CPU in Alcatel OneTouch 768T, both have a 0-Core CPU. Alcatel OneTouch 768T counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Reclaim. Samsung Reclaim has longer battery duration than Alcatel OneTouch 768T, because it has a 1000mAh battery capacity instead of 850mAh.
The Samsung Reclaim's camera is just as good as Alcatel OneTouch 768T's camera, both of them have the same resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Reclaim is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.