Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 0000-00-00 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.13 x 2.64 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and Gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 456 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than the Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, getting a 71.5 score against 55. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's body is a little thinner but a bit heavier than the Alcatel OneTouch Fierce. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has 4.0 version and Alcatel OneTouch Fierce has Android 4.2.2 version.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit better performance than Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a better graphics processor running at 400 MHz and a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit sharper screen than Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, because it has a higher resolution of 1280 x 720px, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and a bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a much better memory to install games and applications than Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 64 GB. Galaxy S III Cricket features a greater camera than Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, because it has a much better (Full HD) video quality and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, because it has a 2100mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs the same than Alcatel OneTouch Fierce, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.