Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.8 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Nokia |
| Android 2.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-10 |
| 4.53 x 2.45 x 0.48 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.16 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 89.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 320 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 165 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Single-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 7.29 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.28 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A has an overall score of 64.8, which is a lot better than Alcatel OneTouch Pixi's 44.8 score. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Nokia 3.1 A has 9.0 Pie version while Alcatel OneTouch Pixi has Android 2.3 version, counting with a couple nice extra features. Nokia 3.1 A is a a lot heavier but way thinner cellphone than the Alcatel OneTouch Pixi.
The Nokia 3.1 A has a greater performance than Alcatel OneTouch Pixi, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. Nokia 3.1 A has a little sharper display than Alcatel OneTouch Pixi, because it has a way higher resolution of 720 x 1440px, a much larger screen and a way greater amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Nokia 3.1 A has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Alcatel OneTouch Pixi, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia 3.1 A features a very superior battery duration than Alcatel OneTouch Pixi, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity instead of 1300mAh.
Nokia 3.1 A takes a lot better pictures and videos than Alcatel OneTouch Pixi, because it has a much better 1920x1080 video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 8 mega-pixels resolution.
The Nokia 3.1 A is a bit more expensive than the Alcatel OneTouch Pixi, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.