Compare phones
Motorola W175
W175, W175g, W180| Global Score | |
| 27.1 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 4.25 x 1.81 x 0.60 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.29 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| CSTN | STN |
| 129 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 1.68 | 2.48 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola W175 is a little bit better than Alcatel OT-209, getting a 28.6 score against 27.1. The Motorola W175 is a just a little thinner but noticeably heavier cellphone than the Alcatel OT-209. Alcatel OT-209 features a slightly better screen than Motorola W175, and although they both have an equal 128 x 128 resolution, the Alcatel OT-209 also has a better display density.
The Motorola W175's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Alcatel OT-209's one. The Motorola W175 counts with a CPU that's very similar to Alcatel OT-209's processing unit, both have the same number of cores. The Motorola W175 features a way better battery performance than Alcatel OT-209, because it has a 940mAh battery size.
Motorola W175 and Alcatel OT-209 have very similar cameras.
The Motorola W175 is a little more expensive than the Alcatel OT-209, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.