Compare phones
Nokia 1661
1661, 1662| Global Score | |
| 27.1 | 27.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Nokia |
| -- | 2008-11-04 |
| 4.25 x 1.81 x 0.60 inches | 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 inches |
| 2.29 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| Gray and Red | -- |
| $ 39.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| CSTN | TFT |
| 129 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 5.3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 3.9 hours talk time |
| 1.68 | 2.32 |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 1661 is a little bit better than Alcatel OT-209, having a general score of 27.3 against 27.1. The Nokia 1661 is a thinner but extremely heavier cellphone than the Alcatel OT-209. The Alcatel OT-209 and the Nokia 1661 count with really similar processors, both have a 0-Core processor. Alcatel OT-209 counts with a slightly better looking display than Nokia 1661, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 128 x 128, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Nokia 1661's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as Alcatel OT-209's one. The Nokia 1661 has a camera that's very similar to Alcatel OT-209's camera. The Nokia 1661 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Alcatel OT-209, because it has 860mAh of battery capacity.
The Nokia 1661 is a bit more expensive than the Alcatel OT-209, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.