Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3131.7
Basic Information
AlcatelSony
--2007-02-06
3.78 x 1.84 x 0.66 inches4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches
2.46 ounces2.89 ounces
Black, Gray and Red--
$ 45.00$ 45.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches--
128 x 160 pixels 128 x 128 pixels
TFTSTN
114 pixels per inch57 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.34.5
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
2,05 MB internal memory2,05 MB internal memory
microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.540.1
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
GPRS and GSMGPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.2
Battery Life
650mAh Li-Ion Battery900mAh Li-Polymer Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
300 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
22.4
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0--
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

The Sony Ericsson K200 is just a bit better than Alcatel OT-565A, having a overall score of 31.7 against 31. Sony Ericsson K200's construction is somewhat heavier but a little thinner than Alcatel OT-565A. Alcatel OT-565A features a more vivid screen than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has a much better quantity of pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 160 x 128px.

Sony Ericsson K200 counts with a CPU that is just as good as Alcatel OT-565A's processor, they have 0 cpu cores. Alcatel OT-565A features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Ericsson K200, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Alcatel OT-565A also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 2 GB.

The Sony Ericsson K200 has a very superior battery life than Alcatel OT-565A, because it has a 900mAh battery size. Sony Ericsson K200 and Alcatel OT-565A feature very similar cameras, both of them have a back-facing camera with a 0.3 MP.

The Sony Ericsson K200 and the Alcatel OT-565A cost the same, making it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.