Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Amazon | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.50 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple, Red and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 285 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than Amazon Fire Phone, with an 80 score against 71.1. The Google Pixel 3 is a a lot newer phone, and it is also just a bit lighter and thinner than the Amazon Fire Phone. Amazon Fire Phone has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a quite smaller screen, a lot lower number of pixels per inch of display and a much lower 1280 x 720 resolution.
The Amazon Fire Phone and the Google Pixel 3 have incredibly similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better performance than Amazon Fire Phone, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The Google Pixel 3 counts with greater battery duration than Amazon Fire Phone, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity instead of 2400mAh. The Google Pixel 3 captures clearer pictures and videos than Amazon Fire Phone, because although it has a lesser MP back facing camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Amazon Fire Phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.