Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Amazon | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.50 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple, Red and Yellow | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 165.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 285 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power is just a bit better than the Amazon Fire Phone, with a 76.1 score against 71.1. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G Power has the previous 11 version while Amazon Fire Phone has Android 4.2.2. Even though the Motorola Moto G Power is extremely newer than the Amazon Fire Phone, it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Amazon Fire Phone features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a much smaller screen, a quite worse pixel density and a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. The Motorola Moto G Power features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Amazon Fire Phone, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Amazon Fire Phone features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Moto G Power captures much clearer videos and photos than Amazon Fire Phone, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a back camera with more mega pixels.
The Moto G Power counts with a way better battery duration than Amazon Fire Phone, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola Moto G Power is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.