Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Purple and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a general score of 85.3 against 78.8. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 11 Pro Max's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3a, but it is noticeably heavier.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a larger display and a little higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. IPhone 11 Pro Max and Google Pixel 3a count with really similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have equal 64 GB internal memory.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.