Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4, having an 85.3 score against 81.9. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 4, but it's a lot heavier. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688px.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Google Pixel 4 counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 42 percent greater battery capacity. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, a back camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, they both have a same size sensor.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.