Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4a's 82.9 score. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a a lot heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 4a, but both are equally thin. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, and Google Pixel 4a counts with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution, a little better screen pixels density and a little bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 4a counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and video and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have the same sensor size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 4a, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.