Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, with an 87.5 score against 85.3. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design has the same thickness than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, but it is a lot lighter. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has Android 11 OS, while Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a better processor than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a brighter display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, a little bit larger display and a just a little higher display density.
IPhone 11 Pro Max and Google Pixel 4a 5G have incredibly similar cameras, and although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a camera with more MP and a bigger aperture, they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and a same size sensor. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.