Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having an 85.3 score against 79.4. IPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G works with Android 14 operating system. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a just a bit heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but both of them are equally thin.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has an extremely better processor than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a better camera than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has longer battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.