Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than iPhone 11 Pro Max's 85.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is newer and lighter than iPhone 11 Pro Max's, although it's a little thicker. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a little bit better pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition and a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.