Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is just a bit better than iPhone 11 Pro Max's 85.3 general score. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer and somewhat lighter than iPhone 11 Pro Max's, although it is just a little thicker. The Galaxy A52 5G comes with Android 12 operating system, while iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a slightly higher resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a just a little greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better camera than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.