Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Galaxy A6, getting a global score of 85.3 against 75.8. The iPhone 11 Pro Max design is newer, but just a little thicker and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A6. IPhone 11 Pro Max features a superior processor than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and 1 GB more RAM.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a much higher pixel density and a lot higher 1242 x 2688 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A6 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB.
IPhone 11 Pro Max captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or video in low light environments and a much less mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera sensor.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A6. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A6, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.