Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-20 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has an overall score of 85.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy C5's general score of 76.4. Although the iPhone 11 Pro Max is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy C5, it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy C5 works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a sharper display than Galaxy C5, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a much worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy C5 features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.