Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | -- |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than the Galaxy F23, getting a score of 85.3 against 84.6. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy F23 works with Android 12 operating system. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a better processor than Galaxy F23, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy F23, although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture.
Galaxy F23 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F23 features greater battery life than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.