Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's overall score of 85.3. The Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie OS, and Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS. Although Galaxy Fold and Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max were released with only 0 months difference, the Galaxy Fold body is somewhat thinner but also heavier.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1242 x 2688px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal memory.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Fold, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit longer battery life than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max and Galaxy Fold count with incredibly similar cameras, and although the Galaxy Fold has a larger diafragm aperture, they both have a 12 mega pixels back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same sensor size and the same 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.