Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a global score of 85.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M20's general score of 78.9. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy M20 comes with Android 10 OS. Even though iPhone 11 Pro Max and Galaxy M20 were released with only 8 months difference, the iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is heavier but a little bit thinner.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px. The Galaxy M20 features a much better memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M20 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has lesser cpu cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back camera with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with improved battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 26 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.