Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's global score of 80.2. The iPhone 11 Pro Max design is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's, although it's much heavier and a bit thicker. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density and a little worse resolution of 1242 x 2688, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note5's storage for applications and games is just as good as the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max one, they have the same 64 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a better CPU than Galaxy Note5, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 11 Pro Max takes slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.