Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | -- |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE's score of 76. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy S24 FE has Android 14 OS. Despite being the best in this review, the iPhone 11 Pro Max body is a bit heavier and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a 64-bit CPU. The Galaxy S24 FE has a little bit better display than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with much more brightness and a little bit bigger display.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S24 FE, although it has a way less MP resolution back facing camera, they both have the same aperture. The Galaxy S24 FE counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with improved battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3969mAh.
IPhone 11 Pro Max costs a lot more than Galaxy S24 FE, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.