Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a score of 85.3, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. IPhone 11 Pro Max's design is way newer and thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also heavier. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a slightly better display than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy S7 Active features a better memory for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 200 GB. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a higher number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active and iPhone 11 Pro Max have similar battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active also has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3969mAh. The iPhone 11 Pro Max shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and a same resolution camera in the back, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with higher video frame rates.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S7 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.