Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-12 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.3 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, getting an 85.3 score against 78.1. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max body is thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, but it is noticeably heavier and was released around 18 months before. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 works with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has lesser CPU cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much sharper display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much higher resolution of 1242 x 2688px, a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 counts with much more storage for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 5 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.