Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, getting a score of 85.3 against 77.6. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 OS. Even though Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is noticeably older than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 2 lesser cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a lot better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels number in each display inch and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 2% more battery size.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels back camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.