Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 456 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 85.3 score against 80.1. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though they were released with only 7 months difference.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little worse pixel density and a bit lower 1242 x 2688px resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower, and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same sensor size and the same resolution back camera, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better battery lifetime than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3969mAh.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.