Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, having an 88.5 score against 85.3. Galaxy Z Flip counts with Android 12 OS, while Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip and Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max were only released 5 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and lighter.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a little bit better performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1242 x 2688.
Galaxy Z Flip's camera is just as good as iPhone 11 Pro Max's camera, both of them have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, a F1.8 aperture, the same video resolution, the same back camera sensor size and a 12 MP camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is more expensive than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone 11 Pro Max. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the iPhone 11 Pro Max, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.