Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is a bit better than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's 85.3 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 OS, while Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer, lighter and thinner than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a bit better pixel density. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 3969mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both have a camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution and the same aperture.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the iPhone 11 Pro Max.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.