Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, having a global score of 85.3 against 83.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max construction has the same thickness than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, but it is heavier. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution, a bit higher pixels amount per screen inch and a bit larger screen.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has 4 GB less RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, the same video definition, a 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a F1.8 camera aperture, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has more internal storage. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has improved battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.