Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with a general score of 85.3 against 83. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T works with Android 10 OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, but Apple made it thinner anyway.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a quite better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a quite better 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution and a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T takes much better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features improved battery performance than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.