Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting an 83.3 score against 78.8. Apple iPhone 11's body is way heavier and just a little thicker than Google Pixel 3a. The Apple iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 counts with a greater processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64 bits processor. Google Pixel 3a has a screen that is very similar to iPhone 11's display, because although the Google Pixel 3a has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each screen inch and a better 1080 x 2220px resolution.
IPhone 11 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a worse video definition and a back facing camera with less MP, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor and the same diafragm aperture. Google Pixel 3a features as much storage to install applications and games as the Apple iPhone 11, both of them have the same internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone 11 has a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3110mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.