Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4a, having an 83.3 score against 82.9. Apple iPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 4a comes with Android 11 operating system. Even being the best phone in this review, it must be noted that it's also an older, a lot heavier and a bit thicker phone.
The iPhone 11 features a quite superior performance than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Google Pixel 4a counts with a bit more vivid display than iPhone 11, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Apple iPhone 11 features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a back camera with less MP resolution, a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and a worse (4K) video definition, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor. Google Pixel 4a features a much greater memory for games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has more internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a's battery life is just as good as the iPhone 11 one, although the Google Pixel 4a also has a 3140mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 4a. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.