Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | -- |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.84 ounces | -- |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having an 83.3 score against 82.2. IPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with Android 14 operating system. Apple iPhone 11 has a much better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 828 x 1792px and a just a little greater screen density.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has more internal storage capacity. IPhone 11 features a much more powerful processor than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much longer battery duration than iPhone 11, because it has a 61 percent more battery capacity. Apple iPhone 11 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.