Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 324 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a general score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the HTC U Ultra's 77 global score. The iPhone 11 body is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better screen pixels density and a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The iPhone 11 has a superior performance than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 also has more CPU cores and a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 11 features a little bit better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The HTC U Ultra has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 11 features a little better battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3110mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, iPhone 11 is also cheaper than the HTC U Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.