Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Apple iPhone 11, getting a score of 83.8 against 83.3. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than the Apple iPhone 11, although both were only released with a couple months difference. The Apple iPhone 11 has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A50, because although it has 2 less cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
Apple iPhone 11 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a little smaller display and a way worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution. The Apple iPhone 11 takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture and a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A50 has better battery life than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3110mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.