Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the iPhone 11's 83.3 general score. The Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie operating system, and iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system. The Galaxy Fold construction is thinner but heavier than the iPhone 11, and both of them were only released 0 months apart.
Apple iPhone 11 counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy Fold, although it has a little bit worse pixel density, a little smaller screen and a lot worse 828 x 1792 resolution. The iPhone 11 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
Galaxy Fold's camera is very similar to the iPhone 11 one, and although the Galaxy Fold has a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light situations, they both have a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, a same size back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates.
Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Apple iPhone 11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Apple iPhone 11. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Apple iPhone 11, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.