Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a global score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's global score of 75.8. Although iPhone 11 is just a little heavier than the Galaxy S7 Active, it's somewhat thinner and way newer. The Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter display than iPhone 11, because although it has a quite smaller display and much worse brightness, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone 11, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 200 GB. The iPhone 11 has a greater hardware performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 also has a larger number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy S7 Active has improved battery duration than iPhone 11, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Apple iPhone 11 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with faster video frame rate.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.