Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, having an 83.3 score against 77.6. The Apple iPhone 11 construction is lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with Android 12 operating system.
The iPhone 11 has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display and a much lower 828 x 1792px resolution. The iPhone 11 has a lot better processing power than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features better battery lifetime than iPhone 11, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3110mAh.
IPhone 11 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the iPhone 11 also counts with a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.