Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 324 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 83.3 score against 80.1. The iPhone 11 construction is a lot lighter and a lot thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were released with only 7 months difference. The iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better looking display than iPhone 11, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher pixel quantity per display inch and a lot better 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lower number of cores, and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 11 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same resolution camera and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the iPhone 11 also counts with a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior battery life than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3110mAh.
The Apple iPhone 11 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.