Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 83.3 score against 81. The iPhone 11 works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 operating system. IPhone 11 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released with only 4 months difference.
Apple iPhone 11 has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits processor. Apple iPhone 11 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792, a little inferior count of pixels per display inch and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The iPhone 11 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a much less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has longer battery life than iPhone 11, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3110mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.