Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the iPhone 11, having a overall score of 88.5 against 83.3. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the iPhone 11, even when they were only released 5 months apart. The Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 OS, and iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper screen than iPhone 11, because it has a bit bigger screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1080 x 2636 resolution. The iPhone 11 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has an inferior number of cores and they are also slower and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior memory for games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and iPhone 11 count with similar cameras, both have the same resolution camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition, a same size camera aperture, the same 60 fps video frame rate and a same size camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little longer battery life than iPhone 11, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than iPhone 11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the iPhone 11. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the iPhone 11, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.