Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than the Apple iPhone 11, having a 90.6 score against 83.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with Android 11 operating system, while Apple iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x operating system. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Apple iPhone 11, but it is also much heavier.
IPhone 11 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a lower number of slower cores and 8 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone 11 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower pixel density and a way worse resolution of 828 x 1792px.
The iPhone 11 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the iPhone 11 also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 11, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior battery duration than iPhone 11, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 3110mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.