Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 has an overall score of 83.3, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 global score. The Apple iPhone 11 design is thinner and a bit lighter than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it was released about 12 months before. The Apple iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 11 counts with a superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit more vivid display than iPhone 11, because although it has a lot darker screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 5160mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better camera than iPhone 11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in low light environments and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.