Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 is slightly better than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, with a global score of 83.3 against 80.2. Even being the best in this comparison review, iPhone 11's construction is just a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro. The iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS, while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10 OS.
The iPhone 11 counts with a little better performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 11 features a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, although it has a little bit worse pixel density, a way lower 828 x 1792 resolution and a quite smaller display.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 11, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro has improved battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 11 costs more than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.