Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | ZTE |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.78 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 has a global score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than ZTE Axon 20's score of 77.8. IPhone 11 is an older and just a bit thicker cellphone than ZTE Axon 20, but Apple was able to make it a little bit lighter anyway. IPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while ZTE Axon 20 counts with Android 10 operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 features a little faster processor than ZTE Axon 20, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. IPhone 11 counts with a little more vivid display than ZTE Axon 20, although it has a just a bit worse pixels quantity in each screen inch, a way worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display.
The ZTE Axon 20 captures much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 11, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the ZTE Axon 20 also counts with a camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures and videos.
The ZTE Axon 20 has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than iPhone 11, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The ZTE Axon 20 features greater battery performance than iPhone 11, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than ZTE Axon 20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the ZTE Axon 20. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the ZTE Axon 20, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.