Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 14.x | -- |
| 2020-11-13 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 mini is much better than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 77.4. IPhone 12 mini is a way newer and a little bit lighter phone than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it's somewhat thicker. IPhone 12 mini counts with a much better looking screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution.
The Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with a better processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Apple iPhone 12 mini also counts with a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 12 mini features just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the iPhone 12 mini also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play counts with improved battery performance than iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2227mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 12 mini is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 12 mini, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.