Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 14.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-11-13 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 477 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 mini is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 88.5 against 80.1. Apple iPhone 12 mini is a extremely lighter and notably thinner cellphone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. Apple iPhone 12 mini works with iOS 14.x OS, while Galaxy XCover FieldPro comes with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The Apple iPhone 12 mini has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 12 mini also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. IPhone 12 mini counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. IPhone 12 mini shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, the iPhone 12 mini also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 102 percent larger battery capacity.
The iPhone 12 mini not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.